The church in Antioch was
different from the one in Jerusalem in that it was a mainly a Gentile church. I
want to explain something before we move forward that I think is important. It
was the tradition of many churches in this day to have a feast before they
celebrated the Lord’s Supper. (You might remember that Paul had to fuss at the
church in Corinth because of the way they were acting at this feast.)
In any case these people would get
together and eat. It seems that there were two tables at the feast. One was the
Gentile table and the other was the Jewish table. The difference being that the
Gentile table had things on it like meat that had been offered to idols. It
also had things like pork and other animals that Jews did not eat. The Jewish
table would be kosher.
There was absolutely nothing wrong
with the things that these Gentiles were eating. In Jesus Christ they had the
liberty to eat what they pleased. The Jews however were not able to break away
from the days when they were in bondage to the Law of Moses, and because of
this weakness they could not enjoy their liberty. The reason I know that the
Gentile table was okay was because that is where Paul ate.
Well one day Peter comes to visit
the church in Antioch. At the feast Peter is presented with something that he has
never really had before, Gentile food. I believe Peter was one of those who
were still living in a certain amount of bondage.
In my mind I can picture Peter
trying pork chops and bacon for the first time in his life. I bet he loved
them. Who doesn’t love bacon? Everything is better with bacon. Peter is really
enjoying himself eating with Paul and the Gentiles.
The problem is that one day some
of the Jews came down to visit, and when they showed up Peter stopped eating
with the Gentiles and returned to the Jewish table. He was ashamed of the liberty
he had been enjoying thereby setting a double standard before these believers.
By returning to the Jewish table
he was saying that living in the liberty of Christ was wrong. When this
happened Paul says that he confronted him face to face.
Before I move on and we beat up on
Peter too much let me ask you a question. How many of us are truly living
examples of what we know as bible doctrines? Peter stood up for this type of
living in Acts 15. After his experience in Acts 11 at the house of Cornelius he
was called on the carpet before the Jews and he defended himself. The problem
here is that Peter’s freedom was threatened by Peter’s fear.
Peter was a very impulsive man. One
moment he is cutting off a soldier’s ear for trying to arrest Jesus and the
next he is denying he even knows Jesus. Peter could walk on water one moment
and be drowning the next.
For Peter to fear was one thing
but for his fear to be brought out in the public was another. If Paul had not
confronted him these false teachers could have used this as an example of proof
for their false teaching.
It is funny how people teach and
preach that a man or woman must keep the law or live without sin in order to
maintain their salvation. The reason this is funny is because outside of Christ
no one has ever been able to keep the law. These Jews were teaching a works
salvation, but they were not able to keep the law themselves.
“Knowing that a man is not
justified by the works of the law.”
This includes the Law of Moses as
well as any other legal system. If a person says that you have to join a
certain church, speak in tongues, be baptized or any other work in order to
obtain salvation they are preaching a false doctrine.
In Hebrews we are given a record
of Christ offering his own blood upon the mercy seat in heaven. Let me point
out a verse to you.
“When he had by himself purged
our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;” Hebrews 1:3
The fact that Jesus sat down after
presenting his blood tells us that the work was finished. If there was more
work to be done then Jesus would not have sat down, he would have kept working.
When Jesus died for you He did everything necessary to purchase your salvation.
Paul even says that “we” had to
leave the law in order to be justified by Christ. The “we” in this verse are
the Jews. The Jews had to turn from their works to faith so that they could be
saved.
The Paul finishes with a pretty
clear statement.
“for by the works of the law
shall no flesh be justified.”
The word “justified” means to
declare a person right. Let me give you a definition of this word.
“Justification is the act of God whereby He declares the believing sinner
righteous in Jesus Christ.”
We are declared right by Jesus
Christ. The wonderful thing about Christ is that when He saves us He not only
removes our sin, but He also adds His righteousness to our account.
If God could have saved us by any
other means then He would have done so. The fact is that the death of Christ
was the only way for us to be justified.
In the garden Jesus prayed “if it
be possible let this cup pass from me.” There was no other way therefore He
willingly laid down his life so that you can live. That was enough for God and
it should be enough for us.
In the next chapter we will be
given a biblical example of a man who was saved apart from the works of the Law.
This man simply placed his trust in God. By doing so God placed righteousness
on his account.
No comments:
Post a Comment